When it comes to common sense jurisdictions, what evidence did the defense attorney provide in an effort to prove the argument in the Jerry Dunham case, and what evidence did the prosecutor provide in an effort to dispute or disprove the defense's argument? Do you agree with the case ruling? Why or why not?
A. The defense presented character witnesses for Jerry Dunham, while the prosecutor provided expert testimony on the incident.
B. The defense provided evidence of self-defense, while the prosecutor presented conflicting witness testimony.
C. The defense argued for reasonable doubt due to lack of evidence, while the prosecutor provided conclusive physical evidence.
D. The defense presented mitigating circumstances for the incident, while the prosecutor showed video evidence disputing the defense's claims.