How does Bahm use the distinction between first-, second- and third-order desires to explain the Buddhist view of suffering?
1) We can mitigate or eliminate the suffered effects of unsatisfied desires at one level if at a higher-order we are okay with having an unsatisfied lower-level desire.
2) We must only satisfy first-order desires to be free from suffering.
3) We must satisfy desires at every level/order in order to be free from suffering.
4) We can mitigate or eliminate the suffered effects of unsatisfied desires at one level if we deceive ourselves into thinking that our lower-level desires have been satisfied.