Albert owns an auto repair shop where he regularly rebuilds engines for customers. Joe contacted Albert in need of help. Albert agreed to tow Joe's car to the shop to diagnose the problem. Once at the shop, Albert realized that Joe's car needed a new engine, and that he had a rebuilt Ford engine that would be perfect for Joe's car. Albert installed the rebuilt engine into Joe's car. Afterwards, Joe was on the way to school with his friend Michelle as a passenger when the gas pedal stuck. He ended up crashing into a telephone poll, injuring both Joe and Michelle. They both missed the last two weeks of school and failed to graduate. If the accident occurred because the connection between the gas pedal and the engine was not properly lubricated when the new engine was installed and Michelle sues Ford under a strict products liability theory for their injuries, what is the likely result?
a) Ford will prevail, because the problem was the result of the installation by Albert.
b) Ford will prevail, because Michelle was not the purchaser of the car.
c) Michelle will prevail, if the gas pedal and the connection were