In "The Secret of Scooby-Doo's Enduring Appeal", Orr incorrectly evaluates Scooby-Doo's likelihood to stand the test of time when he claims, "Scooby-Doo felt like a show just for that particular moment, for [his] specific childhood." Why did he feel this way? Why was he surprised when this was not the case? How was the criteria he was using for his initial evaluation incorrect? And, what criteria does he then use to craft his new evaluation of those "meddling kids"?
