In California v. Hodari D. the Court reasons it would not be "desirable, even as a policy matter, to stretch the Fourth Amendment beyond its words and beyond the meaning of arrest" as Hodari's defense was urging. Which of the following is correct regarding the reasons the court states for such reluctance? Choose the best answer.
a. street pursuits always place the public at some risk and compliance with police orders to stop should be encouraged
b. only a few of police orders will be without an adequate basis, and almost invariably the responsible course is to comply because people receiving such an order have no ready means to identify deficient orders
c. unlawful orders will not be deterred by the exclusionary rule if they are not obeyed because the police do not issue commands expecting to be ignored or give chase hoping to be outrun, so the exclusionary rule applies the deterrent to genuine successful seizures
d. all of these statements correctly state the Court's reasoning on this point