The phrase, "drain the swamp," has become an often-used shorthand for the idea of expelling corruption out of the government. Those who use the catch phrase mean that they want ethics reform in Washington. Reforms like ending wasteful government spending, making changes to campaign financing laws, addressing conflicts of interest, and putting a stop to cozy relationships between legislators and lobbyists who push for their clients' causes on Capitol Hill. But the swamp does not seem to be draining; if anything it is becoming more filthy with slimy politicians. Case in point: recently, a once-beloved state representative was caught red-handed accepting personal gifts from a lobbyist, a fellow former representative. At a press conference, the beleaguered representative, visibly uncomfortable, denied the accusation, saying defensively: "I have never misled the people of this state, nor have I taken bribes or anything of value in exchange for my vote." Who is to say what snake the swamp will spew forth next?

What is one way that the author shows bias toward the topic in this passage?

The author uses opinions disguised as facts.

The author chose a political topic, which will always include bias.

The author employs uncredible expert testimony.

The author cherry-picks the information he provides.
Don't know answer