Atty. FB posted in his/her social media account the following: "WISE POLYGAMOUS HUSBAND? "After marrying a girl as his second wife while his first wife was still alive, when there was no doubt it was bigamous and a crime of bigamy, this man still has the gall to file a petition to declare his second marriage null and void. "In his petition, he asked the RTC of XXX to declare his marriage void because of lack of marriage license and not because of marriage being bigamous. "If you want to read his petition, a copy is attached here. His intention in filing the petition was to prevent the second wife's criminal case of bigamy from succeeding by reason of prejudicial question." Did Atty. FB violate the CPRA? Explain your answer.