A used car dealer in State A is profiled in an article in a newspaper with national circulation. The article states that the dealer never sells a car without rolling the odometer back at least 25,000 miles. In fact, the dealer is an honest businessperson who never changes odometers, so he sued the newspaper for libel in State A state court. The newspaper's entire operation is conducted from its offices in State B, but it sells 5,000 copies in State A on an average day. In its initial pleading, the newspaper argues for dismissal based on lack of jurisdiction over the newspaper because of insufficient contacts.
What is the likely ruling of the court on this issue?
A: Deny the motion because the newspaper's contacts with State A were sufficient so it should reasonably anticipate being haled into court in State A.
B: Deny the motion, unless State A lacks a "doing business" jurisdictional provision.
C: Grant the motion, because selling 5,000 copies of a newspaper per day is not significant business.
Grant the motion, unless State
D: A has a long arm statute covering the newspaper's conduct.