In the retirement savings exercise we did in class, we made assumptions about the values of certain parameters such as real bond return (2%), equity risk premium (3%), volatility of real stock returns (10
%). You may disagree with some of the numbers we used in class. Please do some research and pick alternative values for these inputs that you believe might be more reasonable and rerun the analysis. Please try to provide the sources or your reasoning for picking these numbers. Out of your 1000 simulations of the all-stock strategy's performance, how many gave you a portfolio value at retirement lower than the all-bond strategy? What is the lowest and highest possible value, respectively?