Haroon is a music fan. He says that you can know everything there is to know about music theory, how music is produced, and the social context and fan reception of music, but you still won't understand music if you haven't had the direct, subjective experience of what it's like to listen to it. How might you argue against Haroon's view?
A) A person who learned to respond correctly to questions about music over time would eventually gain some understanding of how the questions and answers go together, even if they never heard music.
B) He hasn't actually explained how a nonphysical property like subjectively experiencing music could arise from interactions between physical things.
C) There is no "central processing unit" in the middle of the brain that receives all the sensory signals and interprets them.
D) The subjective experience of what it's like to listen to music is not factual information, so we do not need science or philosophy to take it into account.