Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

Question

12-05-2015
History

Answered

Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

Answer :

Other Questions

''Life in a city is more rewarding than life outside a city."List two or three arguments in favor of this opinion and two or three arguments opposing this opini

please explain how to solve this On Monday,it took Helen 3 hours to do a page of science homework exercises.The next day she did the same number of exercises

whats the most accurate estimation of 65+77

A pencil measures 14 cm long. How many millimeters long is it?

why did people immigrate to the United States in the late 1800s?

which of the following represents the most accurate estimation of 38+23

whats the most accurate estimation of 65+77

''Life in a city is more rewarding than life outside a city."List two or three arguments in favor of this opinion and two or three arguments opposing this opini

why did people immigrate to the United States in the late 1800s?

HistoryGuy HistoryGuy · Answer 1 · 2015-05-14T09:56:54-04:00

HistoryGuy HistoryGuy

14-05-2015

In general, secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide, and to engage with, other perspectives about a primary source or a certain historical event.

Answer Link

yarelllll yarelllll · Answer 2 · 2020-10-06T11:50:47-04:00

yarelllll yarelllll

06-10-2020

Answer:

Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

a more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event.

Explanation: took the test

Answer Link