Answer :
"None of the above" are not reasons why small societies can maintain stability in the long term better than larger societies, since all of them have a certain merit.
I believe the answer is: D. none of the above
Option A is wrong because larger amount of resources meant that the society have more option to support the citizen's living, which tend to lead to more stability.
option b and c is wrong because larger societies tend to be able to employ more people with different abilities, which make it better for internal controls.
Option A is wrong because larger amount of resources meant that the society have more option to support the citizen's living, which tend to lead to more stability.
option b and c is wrong because larger societies tend to be able to employ more people with different abilities, which make it better for internal controls.