While there are great benefits to a written constitution, there are also significant problems. Problems are resolved by two means, formal and informal changes. The words and ideas in the Constitution must have relevance and meaning for generations and realities that are difficult to imagine. The evolution of technologies and new knowledge make this challenge even more complex.

We only have to look at our U.S. Constitution to see where language has two forms of relevance: The first is what is specifically stated. This is the Constructionist point of view. The second approach is to intelligently determine what was on their minds as it would be applied to an unforeseen circumstance. This is the Activist point of view.

Our history is full of political turmoil as people rarely agree on the correct point of view one should take. After the events of September 11th, 2001, for example, new challenges emerged that were not envisioned by the writers of our constitution. While war was not recently invented, the Web as a battlefront is. Consequently, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has identified the Web as a genuine area of concern and has needed to use an Activist Approach, to gain authority to secure the Internet.

Outline how technological developments have informally changed the Constitution up until now. In the future, what further changes do you anticipate and why?

1. Freedom of Speech and Expression: The rise of social media platforms and digital communication has raised questions about how the First Amendment's protection of free speech applies to the online realm. Issues such as cyberbullying, fake news, and hate speech have forced courts to interpret and apply the First Amendment in new ways.

2. Privacy Rights: The digital age has brought about new challenges to privacy rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment. Cases involving government surveillance, data collection by technology companies, and the use of biometric data have led to new interpretations of privacy rights.

3. Intellectual Property Rights: The advent of digital technology has raised questions about the protection of intellectual property rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Issues such as online piracy, copyright infringement, and the use of digital content have led to new legal interpretations and challenges.

Future changes to the Constitution in response to technological developments may include:

1. Data Protection: With the increasing amount of personal data being collected and shared online, there may be a need for new constitutional protections for data privacy. The right to control one's personal data and limit its use by others could become a vital issue in the future.

2. Artificial Intelligence: As AI technology continues to advance, there may be a need to address the legal and ethical implications of AI in the Constitution. Issues such as accountability, transparency, and bias in AI systems could prompt the need for new constitutional provisions.

3. Cybersecurity: With the growing threat of cyberattacks and online security breaches, there may be a need to clarify the government's role in securing the internet and protecting critical infrastructure. Amendments related to cybersecurity and digital defense mechanisms could become necessary to safeguard national security in the digital age.

Overall, the Constitution will continue to evolve and adapt to technological advancements to ensure that its principles and protections remain relevant and effective in addressing new challenges and opportunities presented by the ever-changing technological landscape.