Read the excerpt from Rudolfo Anaya's essay "Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry."
Tortillas and poetry. They go hand in hand. Books nourish the spirit, bread nourishes our bodies. Our distinct
cultures nourish each one of us, and as we know more and more about the art and literature of the different
cultures, we become freer and freer....
I don't know anyone who doesn't like to sample different ethnic foods, the breads of many many groups; just as
many of us enjoy sampling books from different areas of the world. I travel to foreign countries, and I know more
about myself as I learn more about my fellow human beings. Censorship imposes itself in my path of knowledge,
and that activity can be justified by no one.

Which choice best describes the purpose of this text?

A-to persuade readers to oppose the censorship of literature

B- to inform readers about censorship in a specific country

C- to entertain readers with stories about censorship

D- to motivate readers to speak out against censorship



Answer :

shsidiebdisisnd didhejdid duand thatsbwhy idudid
Xaioo

Answer:

[tex][/tex] A- to persuade readers to oppose the censorship of literature.

Explanation:

Persuading readers to oppose the censorship of literature involves presenting arguments and evidence that highlight the negative impacts of limiting or controlling access to certain books, texts, or information.

In order to effectively make this case, you could:

1. Start by explaining the importance of freedom of expression and how censorship impedes this fundamental right. You can discuss how access to a wide range of ideas and perspectives is crucial for a vibrant and open society.

2. Provide examples of historical instances where censorship has been used to suppress dissent, silence marginalized voices, or control public discourse. This can help illustrate the dangers of allowing censorship to exist unchecked.

3. Address common arguments in favor of censorship, such as protecting children from harmful content or maintaining social order. Explain why these arguments may be flawed or overly restrictive, and suggest alternative approaches to addressing these concerns without resorting to censorship.

4. Highlight the benefits of allowing diverse voices and ideas to circulate freely, including fostering creativity, promoting critical thinking, and encouraging empathy and understanding across different perspectives.

5. Encourage readers to actively resist censorship by supporting organizations, advocating for policies that protect intellectual freedom, and engaging in discussions about the importance of unfettered access to literature and information.

By presenting a well-reasoned and compelling case against censorship, you can help readers understand the value of defending our right to access a wide range of literature and ideas.