After Sharon talks about her management style, Adam turns to you and says, "I thought I heard something about different styles
being effective in different situations. According to Fred Fiedler's Contingency Theory, what situation would be best for Sharon's
management style?"
A moderately favorable situation in which Sharon's relationships with her employees are strained,
but where the employees are still doing highly structured tasks.
A very favorable situation in which Sharon had very good relations with her employees, and the
employees are doing highly structured tasks.



Answer :

In Fred Fiedler's Contingency Theory, the effectiveness of a leader's style depends on the situation. 1. For Sharon's management style to be most effective: - A moderately favorable situation where Sharon's relationships with her employees are strained, but the tasks are highly structured would be suitable. - In this scenario, Sharon's task-oriented style would be more beneficial as the employees are working on tasks that are clearly defined and structured. Her focus on task accomplishment would help guide the employees in completing their work efficiently despite strained relationships. 2. On the other hand, in a very favorable situation where Sharon has excellent relations with her employees and the tasks are highly structured: - Sharon's relationship-oriented style could be more appropriate. - Her emphasis on building strong relationships and creating a positive work environment would further enhance the already favorable situation, leading to increased employee satisfaction and potentially higher productivity. By aligning Sharon's management style with the specific situational factors like relationship quality and task structure, she can adapt her approach to best suit the circumstances and maximize effectiveness as per Fred Fiedler's Contingency Theory.