What is one difference between the ways that Pablo Picasso's painting Portrait of
Ambroise Vollard and Edward Hopper's painting Nighthawks convey space?
Dover Ep
Provst of newvale Viby
Public Photos
Picasso's light figure emerges from a dark background; Hopper's figures blend in
with the background.
Picasso's dramatic lighting creates depth; Hopper's simple shapes flatten the
sense of space.
Picasso's interlacing lines overlap to create depth; Hopper's subtle color palette
flattens the space.
Picasso's fractured shapes flatten the space; Hopper's strong contrast of light
and dark creates depth.



Answer :

The correct difference between the ways that Pablo Picasso's painting Portrait of Ambroise Vollard and Edward Hopper's painting Nighthawks convey space is: - Picasso's dramatic lighting creates depth; Hopper's simple shapes flatten the sense of space. In Picasso's painting, the dramatic lighting, with contrasting light and dark areas, helps to create a sense of depth within the artwork. The interplay of light and shadow adds dimension and a three-dimensional quality to the painting, making it appear more spatially dynamic. On the other hand, in Hopper's Nighthawks painting, the artist uses simple shapes and a limited color palette to create a flatter sense of space. The lack of intricate details or dramatic lighting effects gives the painting a more two-dimensional and static quality, with the figures blending into the background rather than standing out with depth and dimension.