In the context of Franklin preferring to think of the rights of men as a matter of reason and rationality instead of religion, there are several reasons that can be considered:
1. Franklin was a proponent of Enlightenment ideas that emphasized the importance of reason, logic, and empirical evidence in understanding the world and forming societal structures. Therefore, he believed that human rights should be based on rational arguments that could be universally understood and accepted by people of different religious beliefs.
2. By focusing on reason and rationality, Franklin aimed to create a more inclusive and tolerant society where individuals from diverse religious backgrounds could come together based on shared human values and principles rather than specific religious doctrines that might divide them.
3. Franklin's perspective also reflected a desire to establish a secular foundation for human rights, free from the potential conflicts and controversies that can arise from interpreting religious texts or doctrines differently. This approach aimed to ensure that human rights could be universally applicable and respected by all individuals regardless of their religious affiliations.
In conclusion, Franklin's preference for thinking of the rights of men as a matter of reason and rationality instead of religion was rooted in his belief in the power of logic and universal principles to promote harmony, inclusivity, and respect for human rights across different religious beliefs.
