Answered

A botanist compares two types of media for growing tomato plants. When comparing the plants grown in each media, the
botanist believes that the data are significantly different.
Which statement is most reasonable?
○ The botanist should always use the media that he or she believes produced the most vigorous plants.
○ The botanist should do an analysis of the data to see whether the results are statistically significant.
O. The botanist should assume that the difference in the data is significant because biologists are trained scientists.
O The botanist should use a mix of the two media because the evidence shows that one is superior.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer
Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper, here to assist you. In this scenario, the most reasonable statement is: - The botanist should do an analysis of the data to see whether the results are statistically significant. Explanation: 1. Conducting a statistical analysis is essential in scientific research to determine if the observed differences between the tomato plants grown in different media are statistically significant or just due to random chance. 2. Statistical significance helps in drawing valid conclusions from the data and determining the reliability of the findings. 3. By analyzing the data statistically, the botanist can make informed decisions based on evidence rather than assumptions or personal beliefs. Therefore, it is crucial for the botanist to perform a statistical analysis to validate the significance of the differences observed in the tomato plants grown in each media.