How does an executive order different from a federal law?
It is not subject to judicial review.
It can be issued by the President for any purpose.
It does not require a congressional approval
It is based on the implied powers of Congress



Answer :

Executive orders and federal laws differ in several key aspects: 1. An executive order is a directive issued by the President to manage the operations of the federal government. It can be used to enforce laws, direct government agencies, or establish policies. In contrast, a federal law is a law passed by Congress that applies to the entire country. 2. An executive order can be issued by the President for any purpose deemed necessary for the execution of laws or the governance of the country. On the other hand, federal laws must go through the legislative process, including approval by both the House of Representatives and the Senate, before becoming law. 3. Executive orders do not require congressional approval, whereas federal laws must be passed by Congress and signed by the President to become law. 4. Executive orders are subject to judicial review. This means that the courts can examine whether an executive order exceeds the President's authority or violates the Constitution. On the other hand, federal laws can also be reviewed by the judiciary to determine their constitutionality. In summary, while both executive orders and federal laws play important roles in the functioning of the government, they differ in terms of their origin, approval process, and susceptibility to judicial review.