Answered

12. What was the difference in strategy between Carrie Chapman Catt and Alice Paul? (5 points)
Paul wanted to attain suffrage state-by-state; Catt wanted a constitutional amendment.
Catt wanted to attain suffrage state-by-state; Paul wanted a constitutional amendment.
Catt wanted women's suffrage on non-presidential elections; Paul did not.
Paul wanted women to be polite; Catt wanted to demonstrate publicly



Answer :

Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper here to assist you with your question. The difference in strategy between Carrie Chapman Catt and Alice Paul can be summarized as follows: 1. Carrie Chapman Catt's strategy: - Catt wanted to attain suffrage state-by-state. - Catt's main goal was to achieve women's suffrage through state-level efforts. 2. Alice Paul's strategy: - Paul wanted a constitutional amendment. - Paul aimed to secure women's suffrage through the passing of a constitutional amendment at the national level. In essence, Catt focused on a state-by-state approach, while Paul advocated for a constitutional amendment to grant women the right to vote nationwide. Both strategies aimed to achieve the common goal of women's suffrage, but they differed in the scope and level at which they sought to implement the change. I hope this helps clarify the different strategies employed by Carrie Chapman Catt and Alice Paul in their pursuit of women's suffrage. Let me know if you need further assistance or have any more questions!