Mapp V
Ohio, 1961
The
Warren
Court
Engel V.
Vitale,
1962
Escobedo
V. Illinois,
1964
Miranda V.
Arizona,
1966
How did these Supreme Court cases under the Warren Court affect social change during the 1960's?
O It often ruled against radical reform such as desegregation
O It supported civil/voting rights, civil liberties and personal privacy
O It heavily influenced the limits on religion in public spaces
O It supported limits on privacy on civil liberties



Answer :

The Supreme Court cases under the Warren Court had significant impacts on social change during the 1960s. Here's how they influenced social change: 1. **Support for Civil Rights**: The Warren Court decisions, such as Mapp v. Ohio and Miranda v. Arizona, supported civil and voting rights. These rulings helped in advancing the protection of individual rights, particularly in the criminal justice system. 2. **Protection of Civil Liberties and Personal Privacy**: The Court's decisions, including Engel v. Vitale and Escobedo v. Illinois, emphasized the importance of civil liberties and personal privacy. They set precedents for protecting individuals' rights and freedoms from government intrusion. 3. **Limits on Religion in Public Spaces**: Engel v. Vitale, which ruled against state-sponsored prayer in public schools, was a significant case that established limits on religion in public spaces. This decision contributed to the separation of church and state, ensuring religious freedom for all individuals. In summary, the Warren Court's decisions during the 1960s generally supported civil rights, civil liberties, personal privacy, and set limits on religion in public spaces. These rulings played a crucial role in shaping social change and protecting individual rights during that era.