I do indeed believe that we may yet secure peace for our time, but I never meant to suggest that we should do that by disarmament, until we can
induce others to disarm too. Our past experience has shown us only too clearly that weakness in armed strength means weakness in diplomacy, an
we want to secure a lasting peace, I realize that diplomacy cannot be effective unless... behind the diplomacy is the strength to give effect....
According to the quote how did Neville Chamberlain propose avoiding war with Germany?
By discussion and collaboration
By alliances and agreements
By militarization and technology
O By disarmament and treaties



Answer :

In the quote provided, Neville Chamberlain proposed avoiding war with Germany not by disarmament and treaties, but by alliances and agreements. He emphasized the importance of strength in armed forces to support effective diplomacy. This approach aimed to deter aggression and secure peace through a position of military readiness rather than unilateral disarmament. Key points to consider: 1. Chamberlain believed that weakness in armed strength leads to weakness in diplomacy, suggesting that a strong military is crucial for effective negotiation and peacekeeping. 2. By mentioning the need for strength behind diplomacy to give it effect, Chamberlain implied that military power is a fundamental component in achieving lasting peace and successful diplomatic outcomes. 3. The idea of inducing others to disarm only after ensuring their willingness through alliances and agreements reflects a strategic approach to maintaining peace through collective security rather than unilateral disarmament. Therefore, the correct answer to the question would be: By alliances and agreements