Federal courts have the right to review laws that they believe are violating the Constitution. This means that the courts can examine these laws to determine if they are in line with the principles and rights outlined in the Constitution. If a law is found to be unconstitutional, the court can nullify or invalidate it, declaring it void and unenforceable.
Here is a breakdown of the actions in the question:
1. Nullify: Federal courts can nullify laws that are deemed unconstitutional, rendering them invalid.
2. Impeach: Impeachment is a separate process related to removing government officials from office and is not within the jurisdiction of federal courts in relation to laws.
3. Debate: While debates may occur in legal proceedings, the primary function of federal courts in this context is to review laws for constitutionality rather than engaging in debates about them.
4. Review: Federal courts have the authority to review laws to ensure they align with the Constitution and can take action if they find a law violates the Constitution by nullifying it.
Therefore, the correct option related to the rights of federal courts concerning laws that violate the Constitution is to review them and potentially nullify them if found to be unconstitutional.
