A state legislature is divided over a proposal to decrease
state funding to public schools. Supporters of the plan
argue that it will save the state money and give local
governments more control over their own schools.
Opponents claim that it will harm children and reduce the
quality of education throughout the state. However, both
sides agree that voters in the state should decide whether
they approve of the bill before it becomes law.
Which state government political procedure would be most effective at
resolving the public policy issue described in the passage?
A. Recall
B. Police power
C. Initiative
D. Referendum



Answer :

The state government political procedure that would be most effective at resolving the public policy issue described in the passage is a **Referendum**. Here's why: 1. A **Referendum** allows the voters in the state to directly vote on the proposed bill related to decreasing state funding to public schools. This aligns with the agreement mentioned in the passage that both sides believe voters should decide on the bill's approval. 2. Through a **Referendum**, the public can express their views on whether they support or oppose the proposal, providing a democratic way to resolve the disagreement within the state legislature. 3. The outcome of a **Referendum** would reflect the collective will of the voters, indicating whether the majority supports the decrease in state funding to public schools or not. This process ensures transparency and public participation in decision-making. Therefore, a **Referendum** would be the most effective state government political procedure in this scenario as it allows the public to have a direct say in the matter, aligning with the shared agreement of both sides in the legislature.