2. Do you think the United States should negotiate with OPEC, look for ways to reduce our dependence on
oil, send the military to assist in fighting terrorism, or drill in areas that have been protected by the federal
government? Why?
ALISE
United States History B
Credit 4
LAL US History B Chronological (2020) Page 19



Answer :

Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper here to provide you with a clear and concise answer to your question. 1. **Negotiate with OPEC**: The United States could choose to negotiate with OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) to influence oil prices and secure stable energy sources. By engaging in diplomatic discussions with OPEC member countries, the U.S. could potentially benefit from more favorable oil deals and stabilize global oil markets. 2. **Reduce Dependence on Oil**: Another approach could involve actively seeking ways to reduce the country's dependence on oil. This could include investing in renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. By diversifying the energy mix, the U.S. could become less vulnerable to oil price fluctuations and enhance its energy security in the long run. 3. **Military Assistance in Fighting Terrorism**: Sending the military to assist in fighting terrorism is a separate issue from oil-related strategies. While combating terrorism is crucial for national security, it may not directly address the energy-related challenges posed by oil dependency. 4. **Drilling in Protected Areas**: Opening up protected areas for oil drilling is a controversial option that raises environmental concerns. While it could increase domestic oil production, it may also harm ecosystems and wildlife habitats. Balancing energy needs with environmental conservation is essential in making decisions about drilling in such areas. Each of these approaches has its own implications and trade-offs, and the best course of action would depend on various factors, including economic, political, and environmental considerations.