When inferring the US strategy leading up to the attack on Pearl Harbor based on Roosevelt's emphasis on peaceful intentions, several possible interpretations can be made:
1. **Deceptive Strategy**: The emphasis on peaceful intentions by Roosevelt might indicate a deliberate attempt to deceive or mislead other nations, including Japan, about the true intentions of the United States. This could suggest that while publicly advocating for peace, behind the scenes, the US may have been preparing for military actions.
2. **Preparation and Intelligence Gathering**: Another inference could be that the US was actively preparing for potential conflict while outwardly projecting a peaceful stance. The emphasis on peaceful intentions could have been a way to buy time to gather intelligence, build up military capabilities, and strategize for any future confrontations.
3. **Diplomatic Approach**: The emphasis on peaceful intentions might also imply a diplomatic strategy where the US was trying to resolve conflicts through negotiations and peaceful means before resorting to military action. This approach could have been an attempt to avoid war but also to demonstrate to the international community that the US was a proponent of peace.
4. **Strategic Maneuvering**: It's possible that the US was engaging in strategic maneuvering by emphasizing peaceful intentions to assess the reactions of other countries, gauge their preparedness for conflict, and position itself advantageously in case military action became inevitable.
In conclusion, the emphasis on peaceful intentions by Roosevelt could be interpreted in various ways, indicating a complex and multifaceted US strategy leading up to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
