Facts of the case
Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged
that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the
state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's
suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts
ignored significant economic growth and population
shifts within the state....
Conclusion
In an opinion which explored the nature of "political
questions" and the appropriateness of Court action in
them, the Court held that there were no such questions to
be answered in this case and that legislative
apportionment was a justiciable issue. In his majority
opinion, Justice Brennan provided past examples in
which the Court had intervened to correct constitutional
violations in matters pertaining to state administration
and the officers through whom state affairs are
What "political question" did the Supreme Court work
to resolve in this case?
Should the Supreme Court set certain restrictions
on the right to vote?
Should the Supreme Court make the practice of
gerrymandering illegal?
Does the Supreme Court have jurisdiction over the
selection of legislative seats?
Does the Supreme Court have the right to decide
an election that is too close to call?

Question

02-05-2024
Law

Answered

Facts of the case
Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged
that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the
state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's
suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts
ignored significant economic growth and population
shifts within the state....
Conclusion
In an opinion which explored the nature of "political
questions" and the appropriateness of Court action in
them, the Court held that there were no such questions to
be answered in this case and that legislative
apportionment was a justiciable issue. In his majority
opinion, Justice Brennan provided past examples in
which the Court had intervened to correct constitutional
violations in matters pertaining to state administration
and the officers through whom state affairs are
What "political question" did the Supreme Court work
to resolve in this case?
Should the Supreme Court set certain restrictions
on the right to vote?
Should the Supreme Court make the practice of
gerrymandering illegal?
Does the Supreme Court have jurisdiction over the
selection of legislative seats?
Does the Supreme Court have the right to decide
an election that is too close to call?

Answer :

Other Questions

Did the caste system negatively affect women?

Where should you look to quickly find factual information on the causes of the American Civil War? A. Readers' Guide B. Encyclopedia C. Concise Dictionary o

A zoology student is investigating whether it is true that the gender of turtles depends on the temperature at which the turtle eggs are kept before they hatch.

Find the circumference and area of a circle with a diameter of 22 inches. Leave your answers in terms of pi.

Identify the case of the pronoun in the following sentence: I ate the entire pizza. A. Nominative B. Objective C. Possessive

what PEMDAS is this (4+5)78-49

How do you write 120% as a fraction, mixed number, or whole number in simplest form

What defining feature of a soliloquy is found in this passage? A. The character talks to the audience about his problems.B. The character considers philosophica

In "Ooka and the Honest Thief," why does Gonta steal? A. to maintain his reputation B. to help a charity in need C. to punish someone else D. to provide fo

2. Billys teacher asked him to type a report about asian food. Which paragraph format should he use? 3. Billy needs to type bibliography/reference page for the

GinnyAnswer GinnyAnswer · Answer 1 · 2024-05-02T08:01:45-04:00

I am the Brainly AI Helper here to assist you. In this case, the Supreme Court worked to resolve the question: "Does the Supreme Court have jurisdiction over the selection of legislative seats?" The Supreme Court addressed the issue of legislative apportionment, which involves how legislative seats are distributed based on population shifts and economic changes within a state. The Court ruled that legislative apportionment was a justiciable issue, meaning it was a matter that could be resolved through legal action. By asserting jurisdiction over this issue, the Court intervened to ensure that the state's General Assembly seats were apportioned fairly and in accordance with constitutional principles. This case demonstrates the Court's role in overseeing the proper distribution of legislative seats to uphold democratic principles and prevent unfair political advantages. The decision emphasized the importance of judicial review in matters concerning state administration and constitutional violations related to the selection of legislative seats. In summary, the Supreme Court's resolution of the jurisdiction over the selection of legislative seats was a key aspect of this case, highlighting the Court's commitment to addressing constitutional issues and ensuring fair representation in the legislative process.