This question requires analyzing statements about multiple party systems to identify whether they describe strengths or weaknesses of those systems. Let's break down each statement:
1) Citizens feeling it's pointless to vote for the party they actually support indicates a weakness of the party system. It suggests a lack of alignment between citizen preferences and representation.
2) The absence of opposing views being represented points to a weakness in the system as it restricts diversity of opinions and can lead to one-sided decision-making.
3) Citizens having no real voice in the government reflects a weakness as it implies a lack of meaningful participation and influence in decision-making processes.
4) Parties having to collaborate to achieve goals can be seen as a strength as it promotes cooperation and consensus-building for effective governance.
5) Citizens being able to join a party they support, with the likelihood of that party being represented in government, is a strength as it fosters political engagement and representation.
6) Lots of different parties making it hard for the government can be viewed as both a strength (diverse representation) and a weakness (potential for gridlock).
7) Citizens not having to deal with political party drama can be considered a strength as it promotes focus on policy issues rather than internal conflicts.
8) Reform being easy due to no opposition is a weakness as it may indicate lack of checks and balances, potentially leading to hasty decisions.
9) Parties embracing views that include most groups of people in society is a strength as it promotes inclusivity and broad representation.
10) Large groups with opposite views leading to a divided nation is a weakness as it can result in polarization and hinder unity.
In summary, multiple party systems offer a mix of strengths (e.g., diverse representation, cooperation) and weaknesses (e.g., lack of opposition, potential for gridlock). Each statement should be carefully considered to determine its alignment with the strengths or weaknesses of such systems.
