The delay in taking action against the My Lai massacre can be attributed to several factors:
1. Lack of immediate awareness: The atrocities committed at My Lai were not initially widely known or reported. It took time for information to reach the American public through journalist Seymour Hersh's publication in November 1969.
2. Bureaucratic processes: Investigations within the military and government can be complex and time-consuming. It may have taken time to gather evidence, conduct interviews, and navigate the legal procedures required to bring charges against those responsible.
3. Political implications: The My Lai massacre was a deeply troubling event that raised questions about U.S. involvement in Vietnam and the conduct of American troops. Political considerations, including concerns about public perception, may have influenced the timing of the investigation and charges.
4. Military culture and internal dynamics: Within the military, there can be reluctance to expose misconduct or criticize fellow soldiers. This internal culture may have contributed to delays in addressing the massacre.
5. Public pressure and whistleblowers: The actions of Ron Ridenhour, who sought to bring attention to the events at My Lai by appealing to various authorities, played a crucial role in prompting investigations and eventual charges. Without his efforts, the response to the massacre may have been further delayed.
Overall, a combination of factors such as limited initial awareness, bureaucratic processes, political considerations, military culture, and the actions of individuals like Ridenhour contributed to the delay in addressing the My Lai massacre.
