The statement provided suggests that if the desired results are not achieved after implementing a solution, one should go back to the "identify alternatives" step of the decision-making process and revise the decision.
Here's a breakdown to help you understand:
1. **Decision-making Process**: Decision-making involves several steps, including identifying the problem, gathering information, generating alternatives, evaluating options, making a decision, implementing the decision, and finally, evaluating the outcome.
2. **"Identify Alternatives" Step**: In this step, various possible solutions or alternatives are considered before making a decision. It is crucial to have multiple options to choose from to increase the likelihood of success.
3. **Reworking the Decision**: If the chosen solution doesn't lead to the desired results, it is advisable to revisit the "identify alternatives" step. This allows for a reevaluation of the available choices and the selection of a different approach that might better address the issue.
Based on this breakdown, the statement is **True**. Returning to the "identify alternatives" step after unsuccessful implementation can provide an opportunity to reassess and improve decision-making, leading to better outcomes.
