In a claim of value, the argument made focuses on debating whether or not something is right or wrong. This type of argumentation revolves around assessing the moral, ethical, or aesthetic aspects of a particular topic or issue.
For example, when discussing a claim of value about whether art should be censored in public spaces, the argument would involve debating the moral implications of limiting artistic expression versus the potential benefits of protecting certain groups from offensive content.
In contrast, an argument that debates whether or not something is an accepted fact would fall under a claim of fact, where the focus is on establishing the accuracy or truthfulness of a statement based on verifiable evidence or data.
Therefore, in a claim of value, the key focus is on assessing the subjective judgment of what is considered right or wrong, good or bad, rather than simply debating definitions, actions, or factual accuracy.
