Compare and Contrast What three
movements in alternative schooling
developed in the 1960s and 1970s?
How were they similar? How were
they different?



Answer :

In the 1960s and 1970s, three main movements in alternative schooling emerged: 1. **Free Schools**: These schools focused on student-centered learning, allowing students to pursue their interests and learn at their own pace. Teachers acted as facilitators rather than lecturers, encouraging independent thinking and creativity. An example of a free school is Summerhill School in England. 2. **Montessori Schools**: Montessori education emphasizes self-directed activity, hands-on learning, and collaborative play. Students in Montessori schools have the freedom to choose their activities within a structured environment. The Montessori method aims to develop independence, critical thinking, and a love for learning. 3. **Open Education**: Open education promoted breaking away from traditional educational structures and incorporating real-world experiences into the curriculum. These schools aimed to provide a more holistic approach to education by integrating community resources, practical skills, and social awareness into the learning process. Similarities: - Emphasis on student-centered learning: All three movements focused on placing the student at the center of the educational process, encouraging self-directed learning and individual growth. - Alternative to traditional education: These movements sought to provide alternatives to traditional schooling methods by promoting creativity, independence, and critical thinking skills. - Embracing non-traditional teaching approaches: Free schools, Montessori schools, and open education all embraced innovative teaching methods that differed from traditional lecture-based instruction. Differences: - Philosophical underpinnings: Each movement had distinct philosophical foundations influencing their approach to education. Free schools emphasized freedom and self-expression, Montessori schools focused on structured independence and hands-on learning, while open education promoted real-world applications and community involvement. - Organizational structure: Free schools were often run democratically with student and teacher input in decision-making, Montessori schools followed a structured curriculum and environment based on Maria Montessori's principles, and open education schools integrated community resources and real-world experiences into the learning process in a more fluid manner. By understanding the unique characteristics and principles of each of these alternative schooling movements, one can appreciate the diversity of educational philosophies that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, each seeking to provide a more student-centered and innovative approach to learning.