The supporters of Madero who did not see immediate responses to social demands faced various consequences:
1. **Repression:** Some of Madero's supporters who expressed dissatisfaction or pushed for social changes without immediate responses faced repression from government forces or opposing groups. This could include arrests, violence, or intimidation to suppress dissent.
2. **Disillusionment:** When Madero's promises of addressing social demands did not materialize quickly, some of his supporters became disillusioned with his leadership. They might have felt betrayed or misled, leading to a loss of trust in Madero and his administration.
3. **Radicalization:** In the absence of immediate responses to social demands, some supporters of Madero might have turned to more radical or extreme measures to push for change. This could involve joining revolutionary movements or engaging in violent actions to challenge the status quo.
4. **Fragmentation:** The lack of immediate responses to social demands could have caused divisions among Madero's supporters. Some might have splintered off to form new factions or groups with different ideologies or approaches to achieving their goals.
Overall, the delay in addressing social demands by Madero's government could have led to a range of consequences for his supporters, including repression, disillusionment, radicalization, and fragmentation within the movement.
