X Topic 10: Authoritarian states (20th century)
19. Compare and contrast the use of force in the maintenance of power in two authoritarian stat



Answer :

To compare and contrast the use of force in maintaining power in two authoritarian states, we can look at examples like Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union during the 20th century. 1. **Nazi Germany**: - **Use of Force**: The Nazi regime under Adolf Hitler utilized a combination of brutal force and propaganda to maintain power. The Gestapo (secret police) and SS (Schutzstaffel) were key enforcers of repression, arresting and eliminating political opponents, dissenters, and minority groups. - **Examples of Force**: The Night of the Long Knives in 1934, where Hitler purged his own party of potential threats, and the Holocaust, which aimed to eliminate Jews and other targeted groups, showcase the extreme use of force for control. 2. **Soviet Union**: - **Use of Force**: The Soviet Union, under leaders like Stalin, relied on the NKVD (secret police) and the Red Army to enforce control through intimidation, censorship, and surveillance. The Gulag system was also used to suppress dissent through forced labor camps. - **Examples of Force**: The Great Purge in the late 1930s, where Stalin eliminated perceived enemies within the Communist Party, and the suppression of uprisings in Hungary (1956) and Czechoslovakia (1968) highlight the use of force to maintain authority. In comparing these two authoritarian states, both employed violence, censorship, and surveillance to instill fear and eliminate opposition. However, Nazi Germany's focus on racial purity and the extermination of specific groups distinguishes it from the Soviet Union's broader suppression of dissent within the Communist framework. By examining these examples, we can understand the varied ways force was wielded to secure power in authoritarian regimes.