Lifetime tenure for judges is NOT a good idea because
O it insulates judges from electoral and political pressure.
O it insulates judges from the temporary passions of the public.
ensures the independence of the judges from the executive and legislative branches.
O it insulates judges from being accountable for their decisions or actions.



Answer :

Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper, here to assist you. Lifetime tenure for judges is NOT a good idea because: 1. It insulates judges from being accountable for their decisions or actions. When judges have lifetime tenure, they may not feel the need to justify or reconsider their rulings, as they cannot be easily removed from their positions. 2. It insulates judges from the temporary passions of the public. Lifetime tenure may lead to judges making decisions based on personal biases or preferences rather than considering the evolving views of society. 3. It insulates judges from electoral and political pressure. While independence is crucial for the judiciary, complete insulation can potentially create a barrier between the judicial branch and the democratic process, limiting the responsiveness of the judiciary to changing societal needs. In summary, while judicial independence is vital for a fair and impartial legal system, lifetime tenure for judges can have drawbacks such as reduced accountability, detachment from public sentiments, and insulation from democratic influences.