The statement "Comparative advantages order is most appropriate when the audience already agrees that a problem exists" is FALSE.
Here's why:
1. **What is Comparative Advantages Order?**
Comparative advantages order is a method of organizing information by listing reasons or examples in order of strength or importance. It allows the audience to understand the information clearly and make informed decisions based on the presented facts.
2. **Why is it False?**
The effectiveness of using a comparative advantages order does not depend on whether the audience agrees that a problem exists. In fact, this method can be useful in various scenarios, including when the audience may not initially recognize or acknowledge a problem. By presenting information in a structured and persuasive manner, comparative advantages order can help in highlighting the benefits or solutions to address a particular issue, even if the audience does not see it as a problem initially.
3. **Example:**
Let's say a company is trying to convince its employees to adopt a new software system for improved efficiency. In this case, using a comparative advantages order can help in showcasing the benefits of the new system, such as time savings, reduced errors, and increased productivity. Even if some employees may not see the current system as a problem, presenting the advantages in a structured manner can help in changing their perspective and gaining their support for the transition.
In conclusion, comparative advantages order can be effective in presenting information persuasively, regardless of whether the audience already agrees that a problem exists. It helps in organizing key points to make a compelling case or argument, guiding the audience towards a better understanding or decision.
