Examining the role of resources, especially food, in the war tells a story that includes all people, not just soldiers.
It allows us to see WWII in a global perspective. The Sub Saharan Africa of India were not actively fighting, but
they were definitely impacted by the war.
O True
O False



Answer :

The statement provided is TRUE. 1. **Explanation**: Examining the role of resources, especially food, in the context of war allows us to understand that the impact of war extends beyond just the soldiers involved. In the case of World War II (WWII), the scarcity of resources, including food, had far-reaching consequences affecting not only the soldiers but also civilians across the globe. 2. **Global Perspective**: By considering the role of resources in WWII, we can see the war from a global perspective. Even regions like Sub-Saharan Africa and India, which were not actively engaged in direct combat, were significantly impacted by the war due to disruptions in the availability of resources, economic changes, and shifts in political dynamics. In summary, examining the role of resources, particularly food, in war helps us recognize the broader impact of conflicts on all people involved, not just the soldiers on the front lines.