Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper here to assist you.
Elizabeth Anscombe criticized Kant's argument regarding his view on moral obligation. She argued that Kant's emphasis on duty as the sole motivator for moral action was flawed. Anscombe believed that moral actions should not be solely based on duty but rather on virtues and a deeper understanding of morality. She criticized Kant's deontological ethics, which focuses on following moral rules and duties without considering the consequences of actions or the virtues of the individual performing them.
Anscombe's critique highlighted the importance of moral character, intentions, and consequences in ethical decision-making, which Kant's theory tends to overlook. By challenging Kant's perspective, Anscombe contributed to the ongoing philosophical debate on the foundations of morality and the complexity of ethical reasoning.
In summary, Elizabeth Anscombe criticized Kant's argument by emphasizing the limitations of a purely duty-based approach to morality and advocating for a more holistic understanding that includes virtues, intentions, and consequences in ethical decision-making.
