Answer :
The selection of federal justices by the executive branch is an example of advice and consent. This is because the President nominates individuals to serve as federal justices, such as Supreme Court justices, and then the Senate provides advice and must consent to confirm these nominations. This process is outlined in the United States Constitution under the Appointments Clause in Article II, Section 2.
Here's why it fits the description:
1. **Nominations**: The President has the authority to nominate individuals for federal judgeships, including the Supreme Court.
2. **Advice and Consent**: Once nominated, the Senate plays a crucial role in the process by holding hearings, reviewing the qualifications of the nominee, and ultimately voting to confirm or reject the nomination. This process ensures that there is a system of checks and balances in place, as both the executive and legislative branches have a role in the selection of federal justices.
3. **Constitutional Requirement**: The requirement of advice and consent for federal judicial appointments is a fundamental aspect of the separation of powers in the U.S. government. It ensures that nominations are carefully considered and prevent any one branch from having unchecked power over the selection of federal justices.
Therefore, the selection of federal justices by the executive branch is best described as an example of advice and consent.
