The statement suggesting that non-fiction should be called "creative" photography and fiction should be labeled as "editorial" photography is FALSE.
Here's why:
1. Non-fiction photography typically refers to images that depict real-life events, people, places, or objects without altering the reality captured in the image. It aims to represent the truth or reality as it is.
2. Fiction photography, on the other hand, involves creating images that are based on imagination, storytelling, or artistic interpretation. It often includes staged scenes, manipulated elements, or digitally enhanced visuals to convey a narrative or evoke emotions.
3. The terms "creative" and "editorial" are more commonly used to describe the style or approach to photography rather than distinguishing between fiction and non-fiction. "Creative photography" can encompass a wide range of artistic expressions and techniques, while "editorial photography" is often associated with factual representation in journalistic or documentary work.
In conclusion, non-fiction photography is not equivalent to "creative" photography, and fiction photography is not automatically labeled as "editorial" photography. Each type serves different purposes and conveys distinct messages through the images created.
