In this scenario, the most likely result of the city council debate between the two potential water purification systems, reverse osmosis and ion exchange, considering cost as the primary criteria, would be the selection of the system that minimizes maintenance and replacement costs.
1. An ion exchange system would likely be chosen because it does not require specialized maintenance or regular replacement of components. Ion exchange systems generally involve a simpler maintenance process compared to reverse osmosis systems, which might lead to lower overall operational costs.
2. On the other hand, a reverse osmosis system could also be chosen because it does not require specialized maintenance or regular replacement of components. Reverse osmosis systems might offer cost-effective solutions in terms of maintenance and component replacement, making them an attractive option based on cost considerations.
3. More research might be needed if the council wants to fully assess the long-term costs and benefits associated with each system. Factors such as energy consumption, water wastage, and the lifespan of the components could also influence the final decision.
In conclusion, the decision on the water purification system will likely be based on a comprehensive cost analysis that takes into account not only the initial investment but also the ongoing maintenance and replacement expenses associated with each system.
