When OSHA considers relaxing the requirement to use an engineering control to abate a hazard, it could be due to a few reasons:
1. The likelihood of an accident does not warrant the need of an engineering control: If the risk of an accident occurring is very low or the consequences of the hazard are minimal, OSHA may find it acceptable to not enforce the use of an engineering control.
2. The cost to implement the engineering control would be a significant burden on the company: OSHA takes into account the economic feasibility of implementing engineering controls. If the cost of installing the control is excessively high and outweighs the potential benefits, OSHA might consider alternative approaches.
3. The company is willing to pay a premium penalty: In some cases, companies may choose to pay penalties instead of implementing engineering controls. OSHA may consider this option if the penalty amount is significant enough to ensure compliance with safety regulations.
4. The company has never had a recorded accident, despite the presence of the hazard: If a company has a strong safety record and has effectively managed the hazard without incidents, OSHA may exercise discretion in enforcing the engineering control requirement.
Each of these factors can influence OSHA's decision to relax the requirement for using an engineering control, but it's important for companies to prioritize the safety of their employees and comply with regulations to prevent potential accidents and ensure a safe working environment.
