Answer:
C. Both societies had powerful leaders who offered nobles rewards for military service
Explanation:
In terms of similarities, both medieval Europe and Japan had powerful leaders who offered rewards to their nobles for military service. These leaders, such as the European kings or Japanese shoguns, relied on the loyalty and military prowess of their nobles to maintain their power and protect their territories. Rewards could come in various forms, such as land, titles, or other privileges.
Another similarity is that both societies expected their warriors to protect the nobles and serfs. In both Europe and Japan, the warriors, such as knights or samurai, had a code of conduct and duty towards their lords. They were expected to serve and protect them without receiving direct pay, as it was seen as their obligation and part of their social role.
However, there are some differences between European feudalism and Japanese feudalism. In Europe, serfs were at the bottom of the social ladder, while in Japan, the peasants or farmers, known as "eta" or "hinin," were considered the lowest class. The nobles and warriors held higher status in both societies, but the specific social structure varied.
The origins of the leaders in both systems differed. In medieval Europe, powerful leaders like kings were usually born into noble families, while in Japan, some leaders, like the shoguns, could indeed have risen from lower ranks, but it wasn't a common occurrence.
So, both European and Japanese feudalism had similarities in terms of powerful leaders rewarding nobles for military service and the expectation of warriors to protect without pay. However, the social structures and the origins of leaders varied between the two systems.
Hope this helps!