We cannot find substantial equality in the
educational opportunities offered white and
Negro law students by the State. In terms of
number of the faculty, variety of courses and
opportunity for specialization, size of the
student body, scope of the library, availability
of law review and similar activities, the
University of Texas Law School is superior....
It is difficult to believe that one who had a
free choice between these law schools would
consider the question close.
-Sweatt v. Painter
Read the Supreme Court's ruling to the left. What
does it suggest about Texas's African American
and white law schools?
O Separate facilities for African Americans and
whites can be equal.
Separate facilities for African Americans and
whites may be unequal in quality.
Separate facilities are alright as long as there
is a common library.
DONE
1950



Answer :

Final answer:

The Supreme Court's ruling in Sweatt v. Painter revealed the inequality in educational opportunities between African American and white law schools in Texas, leading to the desegregation of the UT Law School.


Explanation:

The Supreme Court's ruling in Sweatt v. Painter suggested that separate facilities for African Americans and whites may be unequal in quality, as evidenced by the comparison between the University of Texas Law School and the law school for Negroes created by the state of Texas, highlighting disparities in faculty, courses, student body, library resources, and extracurricular activities. This case played a significant role in challenging the notion of 'separate but equal' and ultimately led to the desegregation of the UT Law School.


Learn more about Segregation in Education here:

https://brainly.com/question/42894686