Judicial activism and judicial restraint both have their pros and cons, influencing legal decisions and shaping policy. While activism can bring about positive change, it also raises concerns about the role of the judiciary in creating laws.
Judicial Activism is when judges use their power to shape laws or rights, while Judicial Restraint involves limiting their power and deferring to elected branches. Negative consequences of activism include bypassing legislative processes and creating controversy. However, activism can lead to positive outcomes like defending individual rights and liberties.
https://brainly.com/question/29545866