Answered

2. Which of the following details best explains why the
Antikythera mechanism was not studied until the late 1900s?
OA. "in lieu of sea creatures, they found a Roman shipwreck
full of treasures, including the remnants of an archaic device."
(Paragraph 1)
OB. "Divers descended nearly 150 feet to reach the
shipwreck of the Roman trading ship." (Paragraph 1)
OC. "Discovered in 82 broken, corroded pieces... the
damaged artifact was initially disregarded." (Paragraph 2)
OD. "After two decades of study, physicist and historian
Derek de Solla Price published the first research on the
Antikythera mechanism in 1974" (Paragraph 2)



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The Antikythera mechanism was not studied until the late 1900s due to being initially disregarded and later analyzed by physicist Derek de Solla Price, reflecting historical challenges in recognizing ancient artifacts.


Explanation:

TheAntikythera mechanism was not studied until the late 1900s primarily because of its initial disregard due to being discovered in 82 broken, corroded pieces.

It wasn't until physicist and historian Derek de Solla Price conducted an in-depth study over two decades that the Antikythera mechanism gained prominence in 1974.

This delay in study highlights the historical challenges and misconceptions surrounding the understanding and recognition of ancient artifacts.


Learn more about Antikythera mechanism here:

https://brainly.com/question/38358979


Other Questions