Answered

In the 1800s, Theodor Schwann used microscopes to study animal tissues. Based on the results of his
investigations, he proposed that new cells form in the material between existing cells. Today, we know that
new cells form by cell division. Which of these best describes whether Schwann's work could be classified as
science?
It was not science because it was later shown to be incorrect.
It was not science because his ideas were not able to be tested.
It was science because he used observations to form a hypothesis.
the
It was science because the work was conducted using instruments.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Schwann's work can be classified as science because he used observations to form a hypothesis that contributed to the development of the cell theory.


Explanation:

Theodor Schwann's work could be classified as science because he used observations to form a hypothesis based on his microscopic studies of animal tissues in the 1800s. Despite some inaccuracies in his initial conclusions about cell formation processes, Schwann's work laid the foundation for the cell theory, which was further refined by subsequent scientists.


Learn more about Cell theory and scientific classification here:

https://brainly.com/question/10045971


Other Questions