Exploring the two sides of life appointments - pros advocating change and cons supporting the status quo, delving into the counter proposal concept, and the importance of understanding audience priorities in arguing for life appointments.
When examining life appointments, the pro-side argues for change while the con-side supports the current state, known as the 'status quo.' An example is the debate over lifetime appointments for judges, where the pro-side may argue for increased independence and expertise, while the con-side may highlight potential lack of accountability and adaptability.
Counter Proposal: In some cases, the con-side may acknowledge weaknesses in the current system but propose alternative approaches. This approach aims to address concerns while offering a different solution rather than outright rejecting change.
Target Audience Priorities: The pro-side must convince the target audience that the change they propose deserves priority status over existing claims. Understanding the priorities of the audience is crucial in formulating a convincing argument for life appointments.
https://brainly.com/question/492727