Why don't states have as much flexibility in setting age qualifications as
they do with citizenship and residence qualifications?
O
O
A. Age qualifications are stipulated in the Constitution.
B. Only states have the ability to track a person's residency status.
C. Since legal adult status is achieved at 18, states must allow
people to vote at this age.
D. Citizenship qualifications are too complicated to be set by the
federal government.

States have less flexibility in setting age qualifications compared to citizenship and residence qualifications due to the Constitution stipulating the age requirements. Unlike citizenship and residence, which can vary more, age qualifications are more rigid and centrally regulated.

For example, the Constitution sets the minimum age of 18 for voting, making it a fixed requirement across states. This age threshold is a legal adult status. In contrast, residency and citizenship qualifications can vary more between states based on local laws and regulations.

Citizenship and residency qualifications for voting can be influenced by a state's specific election laws and historical practices, allowing more variation and flexibility compared to age requirements.

Learn more about States' Flexibility in Setting Voting Qualifications here:

https://brainly.com/question/34139711