If you were the American president, would you rely more on "hard" or "soft" power when implementing your foreign policy strategies? Please provide an example (taken from the lecture, text, or your
prior knowledge) that demonstrates a US president employing one of these two approaches to foreign policy power.
To earn full credit, you must post a 100 word contribution that references one piece of evidence from this module's assigned curriculum. You must also post a 100 word reply to another student that
is constructive or otherwise intellectually respectful.



Answer :

Final answer:

The concept of hard and soft power in international relations is crucial for shaping a nation's foreign policy strategies.


Explanation:

Diplomacy as Soft Power

The concept of power in international relations can be described as the degree of resources, capabilities, and influence in international affairs. It is often divided up into the concepts of hard power and soft power. Hard power relates primarily to coercive power, such as the use of force. Soft power commonly covers economics, diplomacy, and cultural influence. There is no clear dividing line between the two forms of power. However, diplomacy is usually regarded as being important in the creation of "soft" power, while military power is important for "hard" power.


Learn more about diplomacy in international relations here:

https://brainly.com/question/32989190